Reported clue clarity
Groups are based on source clarity, channel specificity, and whether a clue can be checked in a live scene.
This is a signal-clarity tier list. It does not rank visitors by power, rarity, combat value, or a made-up S/A/B meta.
Groups are based on source clarity, channel specificity, and whether a clue can be checked in a live scene.
Recheck after Roblox listing changes, platform changes, or a better current guide.
If sources disagree or a clue is absent, the visitor stays in needs-another-check.
Use the group as a next action: first check, follow-up channel, or deliberate hold.
Use a visible camera, audio, house-state, or outside clue that is explicitly described by a collected source.
Reported community signal; not a power ranking.
Use night vision, audio, or an outside-camera check when a visitor needs more context than the first view gives.
Reported channel; exact coverage can change after updates.
Keep a visitor in the review queue when the first sources do not provide a reliable current tell.
Do not turn an unresolved report into a confident answer.
These entries have at least one collected signal tied to a camera, night vision, audio, house state, or outside context.
The roster is visible, but a reliable current tell was not confirmed in the first pass.
No. Home Alone (Anomaly) is treated as an evidence game here. The groups describe how clear and useful a reported clue is, not how strong a character is.
It means the available sources did not establish a reliable current tell. Hold the verdict rather than opening or rejecting based on a guess.